|
Forbes June 10,
2002
http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2002/0708/048.html
|
Family Feud |
|
Six years ago Kinko's founder Paul Orfalea
and his partners handed over the keys to their printing empire to a
buyout firm. They're still waiting for a payday. By RiShawn Biddle |
|
For a company that once
prided itself on collegiality, last month's annual meeting of Kinko's at the
Inter-Continental Hotel in Dallas was a sobering event. The privately held
copying giant provided only soda and water for the 20 or so attendees, several
of whom blasted Kinko's largest shareholder, buyout firm Clayton, Dubilier
& Rice. One unhappy shareholder
was conspicuously absent: Paul Orfalea, the soft-spoken, self-deprecating
founder of Kinko's, whose curly red hair was the source of the company name.
Although he still owns 15% of the company and holds the honorary title of
"chairperson emeritus," Orfalea has been persona non grata at Kinko's
for the past two years. He needs permission from the company to visit any of
Kinko's 1,100 stores. But that hasn't
prevented Orfalea from launching a behind-the-scenes feud with Clayton,
Dubilier, whose funds own 42.5% of the company and control 7 of its 13 board
seats. Orfalea and his 125 former partners, who collectively own 35% of the
company, are demanding that Clayton, Dubilier either take Kinko's public or buy
them out. Clayton, Dubilier has rejected both requests. "My brother
expected Clayton, Dubilier to take us public in two or three years. They haven't
delivered," says Orfalea's older brother Richard, a former Kinko's
executive. Retorts Kinko's board
member and Clayton, Dubilier President Donald Gogel: "The company can't go
public, and that's the position we're in." Although it's been
several years since Orfalea, 54, has had any day-to-day responsibilities at the
company, he can't detach himself. "He feels an obligation to the
customers, the co-workers and us former partners. We're family to him, and he
really hates the way we've been treated," says Eric Johansing, who
recently sold his remaining stake back to Clayton, Dubilier and the company. The squabble has its
roots in a series of transactions beginning in 1996, when Clayton, Dubilier
rolled up the 130 partnerships that owned Kinko's into one company in exchange
for a 27.5% stake and effective control. Looking to take advantage of the
late-1990s bull market, Orfalea and his partners took stock in the new company
with the expectation that it would go public in a feverish market for new
issues. "Clayton, Dubilier
showed us charts and stuff, telling us we were supposed to be the next
Starbucks," says former blackjack dealer Gerald Alesia, who co-owned nine
stores with Orfalea. "That's the only reason why anyone did the
deal." Six years and a bear
market later, the partners are still waiting. While Clayton, Dubilier bought
back some stock two years ago, they offered just a 64% premium over the
original share price of $11. There's no telling what price the shares would
command on the open market today. This much is clear: Wall Street is cool to
new issues these days. Orfalea has hired
lawyers and an investment banker. He is also looking to sue Kinko's and
Clayton, Dubilier for refusing to issue the same earnings projections to the
smaller shareholders that it allegedly provides to AOL Time Warner and J.P.
Morgan Chase, who each hold 11.5% stakes. In the meantime, Orfalea
has been hounding management with a weekly fusillade of e-mails and
single-spaced letters in which, among things, he blames Clayton, Dubilier for
the company's 56% decline in net income since 1996, to $60 million last year on
revenue of $2 billion (Clayton, Dubilier's Gogel disputes the numbers, but
refuses to cite the official results). Orfalea slyly hints in his missives that
Clayton, Dubilier is dragging its feet on the public offering in order to avoid
losing the more than $5 million in annual management fees it collects under the
present arrangement. Nonsense, says Gogel.
"We would love this company to go public more than anyone. We've got a lot
of money into this company and we've been in it for six years. But everyone
knew that a significant transformation would be required in order for it to go
public. And it's been far more difficult to do. It's like Gallo wine: You don't
go public before its time." As for the other
shareholder complaints, Gogel is hardly sympathetic: "We're the ones
who've made the significant new-dollar investment, and we've done it twice.
Other people left and took money off the table." In February Kinko's said
it may consider buying back the shares held by Orfalea and his partners. But
such a resolution may come too late for Cathy S. Reissman, who learned she had
lung cancer soon after her sister and fellow shareholder died last year.
"My sister didn't get a chance to reap the fruits of her life's efforts.
And now it looks like I may have to fight to see mine |